šĀ Two absolute standouts: Checks and Focused Session.
šĀ Checks is great because the edits are actually coherent. It just works.
šĀ Focused Session is great because Iām able to measure how Iām making progress during my focus session. Beautiful.
šĀ The introduction document is informative, but I found it difficult to recall what it said once I started working in my own document.
šĀ Small UI ābugsā that are easily fixed e.g. no empty messages allowed.
šĀ The āglobalā Ask Lex was frustrating. It did not (yet) add any value to the writing process.
Ask Lex experience
All discussions lie on a spectrum defined by two extremes: boring vs. unfocused. Productive discussions are in the sweet spot: just enough input that the conversation evolves naturally, but not so much that it loses direction and momentum.
Ask Lex leans too far towards the āunfocusedā extreme due to the turn-based chat experience.
I much prefer the ālocalā Ask Lex interactions, where I must tag Lex explicitly to get a response.
But tagging to get a response is clunky when the interface is designed purely for chatting.
The demo on the right improves on the ergonomics.
Enter sends a message, with no LLM response.Meta + double Enter sends a message, and calls the LLM for a response.
*demo generated by Claude Sonnet 3.5
This chat experience is much more balanced on the spectrum because control returns to the user. People know when they are uninspired and, conversely, when they are in a flow state. A writing experience that ignores that awareness feels frustrating and rigid.




