TL;DR

šŸ’šĀ Two absolute standouts: Checks and Focused Session.

šŸ’šĀ Checks is great because the edits are actually coherent. It just works.

šŸ’šĀ Focused Session is great because Iā€™m able to measure how Iā€™m making progress during my focus session. Beautiful.

šŸ’›Ā The introduction document is informative, but I found it difficult to recall what it said once I started working in my own document.

šŸ’›Ā Small UI ā€œbugsā€ that are easily fixed e.g. no empty messages allowed.

šŸ’”Ā The ā€œglobalā€ Ask Lex was frustrating. It did not (yet) add any value to the writing process.

What I would do to improve the Ask Lex experience

Untitled

All discussions lie on a spectrum defined by two extremes: boring vs. unfocused. Productive discussions are in the sweet spot: just enough input that the conversation evolves naturally, but not so much that it loses direction and momentum.

Ask Lex leans too far towards the ā€œunfocusedā€ extreme due to the turn-based chat experience.

I much prefer the ā€œlocalā€ Ask Lex interactions, where I must tag Lex explicitly to get a response.

But tagging to get a response is clunky when the interface is designed purely for chatting.

The demo on the right improves on the ergonomics.

interaction_demo.gif

*demo generated by Claude Sonnet 3.5

This chat experience is much more balanced on the spectrum because control returns to the user. People know when they are uninspired and, conversely, when they are in a flow state. A writing experience that ignores that awareness feels frustrating and rigid.

Set up

Onboarding

Untitled

Untitled

Untitled

Document writing

Untitled

Untitled